04 / 15ToolsData Automation / Quality Assurance2026
Drawing Checker Tool
Title block QA that most UK contractors still do by hand, done in FME instead. A 462-drawing package is read, validated against project-specific rules and reported pass or fail with error detail, in 2.8 seconds.
FME
AutomationOngoing
- Organisation
- Role
- Year
- Kind
- Sector
- Status
Background
Most UK construction firms still perform drawing title block checks entirely by hand. It is tedious, it is error-prone at scale, and it consumes document control resource on work that is purely rule-based.
What I built
A two-stage FME tool. The first stage reads PDF drawings and extracts title block data. The second validates that data against configurable, project-specific rule sets using FME's transformation capabilities.
Output is an Excel report listing pass or fail status and error detail per drawing.
01 Input
02 Stage one
03 Stage two
04 Report
Drawing pack
Extract
Rule set
Validate
Document control
01 Input
Drawing pack
02 Stage one
Extract
03 Stage two
Rule set
Validate
04 Report
Document control
Outcome
A package of 462 drawings is checked in 2.8 seconds.
The saving that matters is not the 2.8 seconds. It is that the check becomes cheap enough to run on every issue rather than on a sample, so a title block error is found before the pack leaves rather than by the person receiving it. The document control time it releases is the part that shows up in a fee.
Where it goes next
Currently in testing, around 40 percent complete, being trialled against previously hand-checked drawing packages to validate accuracy. Next steps are broadening compatibility across drawing packages and embedding outputs into existing QA workflows. Designed with a shared tool core and swappable rule sets so it scales across projects.
Tools and disciplines
- Built with
FME
- Discipline
Data AutomationQuality Assurance